Breadcrumb Trail left
The taxes and regulation that enables the development of Stifle development would enable Canada's world-class developers
Published Apr 02, 2025 • Last updated 10 hours ago • Read 4 minutes
You can save this article by registering here for free. Or register if you have an account.
The apartment in Canada is in crisis because the demand has exceeded the supply of new houses. Photo by David Bloom/Postmedia
Article content
We are continuously listening to the latest programs, subsidies and other plans to deal with the real estate crisis, but they always aim at symptoms. And the source cause of Canadian residential problems is uncomplicated: surplus taxation and intensive regulation of the construction, which restrict and increase the costs.
Article content
Article content
We tax and regulate the things we want to discourage: cigarettes, alcohol, gas and surprisingly live. When I added a 10 × 10-foot breakfast to my house from the 1940s in 1980, a permit cost $ 25 and lasted one day. Today, public hearings, thousands of dollars for architects, lawyers and consultants and a process of one year or more would be exposed.
Advertising 2
This display has not yet loaded, but your article will continue below.
This content is only reserved for subscribers
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and all over Canada.
- Exclusive articles by Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
- Daily content of Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
- Unlimited online access to read items from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with an account.
- National Post Epaper, an electronic replica of the print output to see, divide and comment on each device.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times crossword.
Subscribe to more items unlock more items
Subscribe now to read the latest news in your city and all over Canada.
- Exclusive articles by Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
- Daily content of Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
- Unlimited online access to read items from Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with an account.
- National Post Epaper, an electronic replica of the print output to see, divide and comment on each device.
- Daily puzzles, including the New York Times crossword.
Register / register to unlock more items
Create an account or register to continue your reading experience.
- Access to articles from all over Canada with an account.
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
- Enjoy additional items per month.
- Get E -Mail updates from your preferred authors.
This article is free to read the register to unlock.
Create an account or register to continue your reading experience.
- Access to articles from all over Canada with an account
- Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments
- Enjoy additional items per month
- Get e -mail updates from your preferred authors
Register or create an account
or
Article content
The apartment in Canada is in crisis because the demand has simply exceeded the supply of new houses. At the start of peak houses, 273,000 new houses with a population of around 23.5 million people were delivered. Today, with 41.5 million Canadians, we are still at this climax. For this reason, Canada has very few houses per capita in the G7, 25. In the organization of the development of economic cooperation (OECD).
The prices rise when the demand exceeds the supply. It is a law of economy. To this imbalance, the cost load due to excessive taxation and regulation for the new building, which is passed on to the buyer or tenant.
Today, in Toronto, around a third of the costs of all forms of new apartments are taxes, fees, levies, etc. from all three government levels, while specially built residential buildings receive an HST exception. If all of these fees were foregone, the necessary rental prices would decrease by a third, which supplemented many blocked residential projects profitably and a new offer at reduced costs. If a new delivery is added, the price for older rental stocks will also drop.
The concept of waiving development fees, taxes and levies for construction has caused the concern of the pressure on municipal finances, but this is largely a timing problem. The creation of the resulting real estate tax flows is more valuable for communities than one -off development costs.
Top stories
Thank you for signing up!
Article content
Advertising 3
This display has not yet loaded, but your article will continue below.
Article content
By refraining from unique taxes and fees for new apartments, we can accelerate the construction and expand our property tax base in order to achieve far more tax income than with an underdeveloped country. In many countries, the municipalities will provide the financing of tax increases for the construction of the incents in order to achieve the resulting property tax service that continues forever.
In Toronto it is exactly the opposite: high taxes on the construction are to be disadvantageous to write new apartments, whereby the focus of one -time fees is at the center of the income flows with several generations from extended property taxes.
The regulations also play a leading role in reducing delivery and increasing the costs. A typical project lasts three or four years from the country assembly to the start, whereby the authorization costs are more for the delays at millions and millions. All of this adds costs that are borne by the buyer or tenant.
The federal elections have brought a strong contrast through the conservative and liberals with a strong contrast. The conservatives have focused on eliminating the taxation and fixing the regulations in order to unleash the private sector that has the execution of scale, skills and capital.
Advertising 4
This display has not yet loaded, but your article will continue below.
Article content
Due to the permission of the industry to build and reduce construction costs, the private sector will react with a much larger new household offer. This leads to an accelerated offer with reduced costs for new incremental apartments that affect everyone, since the new offer is delivered at competitive costs, another law of economics.
The liberals have announced that they intend to enter the development business to build housing buildings. Do we really want the federal government to become a developer with its regulatory overload? If you deal with the catastrophic condition of your housing initiatives in our military bases and indigenous reserves, the federal government should possibly concentrate on ending this promise first.
So if we are more affordable, the voters have to send a clear message to our politicians. Let us unleash our first -class development industry and not try to create it again. Let us give the thousands of developers all over the country the permission to get it with a simple three -stage approach:
- Remove all taxes, levies and fees for the construction of all forms of new apartments.
- Overtake the regulatory process to issue the permits within six to nine months.
- Incent builders for construction, with the aim of expanding the property tax base.
The good news is that our real estate crisis is a result of poor public order. The better news is that it can be fixed with enlightened guidelines that unleash Canada's first -class development industry. Change is required – now.
Recommended by editorial
-
Canada not only as dissatisfaction with housing costs
-
In order to solve the affordability of living space, Canada must set productivity
Jon Love is the Executive Chair and founder of Kingettett Capital.
Article content
Share this article further in your social network