On February 5, 2025, the Toronto City Council officially adopted official plan (Grandpa) 778, a comprehensive new guideline update that is many options for the development of Torontos. The initiative is part of the city's housing action plan (HAP), which was adopted by the city council in December 2022 and proves the urban employees to explore a large number of opportunities “to increase the range of housing, the choice of housing and the affordability of the current and future residents,” according to the city's website. The grandpa contains several remarkable changes that reflect a new vision for the city and aim to rationalize processes and at the same time promote measures to deal with local companies and residents during the entire development process. Urbantoronto spoke to Kyle Fearon, project manager with strategic initiatives, politics and analysis in the city of Toronto, which made further contributions to the changes.
Avenues Grafik, picture with the friendly approval of the city of Toronto.
The city defines loose “paths” as important streets, which are referred to as growth areas that are operated by the frequent transit. According to Toronto's standards, the frequent transit includes all forms of public transport that offer over 10 minutes or less service all day and provide services on the evenings and weekends. In addition, there is a logical refinement in the selection of which streets or parts of the streets are shown as paths: For example, the routes of important roads along environmentally friendly spaces and employment areas are avoided. After secondary institutions, due to their higher transit use. And parts of the most important streets that connect two nearby paths can fill unnecessary gaps.
The official plan was originally known as 172 km of paths, which were distributed in Toronto. With Grandpa 778, however, the city has added a whopping 283 km of new possibilities, which has created a comprehensive network of around 455 km of roads that cross the city. The expansion of the designated paths directs growth to far more areas than before in order to absorb a new housing in a variety of forms.
Updated card 2 of the official plan, which shows the newly designated paths, image with the kind permission of the city of Toronto.
Fearon explained that the primary objective of the grandpa is to align growth with transit, and that the update in the avenue policies is guided by the recently updated chapter one of the official plan, which city city adopted in April 2024. Chapter one defer the overall vision of the office Information all policies contained with, and had not been updated history the plan was first introduced way back in 2002. The new vision included Many imports components that previous missing from the official plan, search to create complete communities; A focus on sustainability; Emphasis on the city's multiculturalism; And among other things to contribute to a fair future for indigenous peoples.
One of the largest updates in Grandpa 778 is the removal of the Avenue study requirement. Previously, the official plan had instructed the city's employees to carry out a separate examination of the individual designated avenue, since it was recognized that everyone was different and should have their own specific growth policy. Since 2002, the city has completed over 30 studies with around 44% of the original 172 km paths in the official plan.
In the Avenues style under construction along the Dundas Street West in the Junction, picture of Urbantoronto Forum employee Rdaner
In order to optimize the planning and development process, the city's employees collected all the knowledge and best practices gained from the previously completed studies and used those to create a number of universal guidelines that apply to all paths, which requires the need to create a study for each individual. Over the years, the city has found several frequent features in the paths, such as the development mainly in the form of medium buildings and growth along the paths that are incremental over time instead of taking place at once. In addition, the introduction and refinement of the city's established guidelines for high buildings and medium -sized risks that were not available in the creation of the original official plan have contributed to giving guidelines for the built form of new developments over the years. All of these factors were included in the new Avenue guidelines that remove the need for studies, provided no special circumstances justify you.
Another significant admission to the grandpa are new guidelines that aim to take into account the shift of existing companies at renovation locations. This is a topic that the city has repeatedly heard through its community consultations and that they want to finally address. The city acknowledges that many ways of Toronto's destinations for residents and visitors are alike, from the far -reaching attractiveness of paths such as Queen and Bloor to the local focus from paths such as Eglinton, Broadview or Mount Pleasant.
Block context plan for 2451-2495 Danforth Avenue, picture of the submission of the city of Toronto.
The first aspect of these shift guidelines is the prerequisite for the use of uses that activate the ground floor. The text for this requirement is deliberately vague, since the active ground floor should be specific for the local context, but generally refers to commercial and institutional uses that serve the wider community. There is no fixed amount in relation to the floor area or the number of units, but it is intended to replace both business or non -profit service caused by the renovation and to contribute to building more complete communities throughout the city by integrating a more diverse mix of uses.
The second aspect of the new shift policy focuses on communication. If a new development would lead to loss or expulsion of existing companies or non -profit providers, the city applicants must present a consultation strategy. The consultation strategy would show how applicants advise themselves with the community about their needs of these services. how companies or non -profit providers are consulted for their return on the potential; And how the community and the affected services are informed about the development.
A TTC Streetcar Plies King Street West, one of the paths of Toronto, image of Urbantoronto Forum participating T3G
The city essentially forced the city between the applicants and the parties concerned in order to offer better activation on the ground floor than the usual franchise coffee or the Fast -Food chain, the pharmacy or the usual franchise coffee. The city cannot force applicants to incorporate certain tenants or uses in their buildings, but they can enable consultations to provide applicants with the information they need to provide uses that benefit all. The hope for a win-win situation in which the community can receive the services it needs or wants, and the applicant can ensure the longevity of your tenants by providing something that you know that the locals are common.
The guideline also forces applicants to notify all tenants in several merger buildings, which are provided for for or near developmental proposals that have submitted an application. Currently, announcements only have to go to building owners, not necessarily tenants of these buildings. It seems like child's play, but the city wants to close this gap by force the owners to inform all occupants about a renovation application, which unfortunately was not always the case.
Block context plan for 4231-4241 Dundas West, picture by submitting to the city of Toronto.
With regard to the built form, the grandpa controls the new developments from the recording of defined height restrictions, but says that the desired built form along the middle skin, with a greater height and density in the immediate vicinity of the transit stations of higher order, ie subway, GO and LRT stops. Fearon explained that the height and the built form of each development will always be contextual and will react to the local environment. These new guidelines are to be used in connection with the current plan described in the official plan, which are not changed as part of this update and regulate the form built throughout the city.
For example, areas of mixed use and apartment in the neighborhood have already imposed no height limit, while the residential areas usually limit the heights to six floors or less. If a development application on a street is in an area referred to as mixed use, it can be the height that is appropriate for the context, be it in the middle of the middle or a tower if it is next to a transit station. In all scenarios, it is necessary that there is a process to be neighboring low-rise quarter, whereby the high-altitude peaks are closest to the transit stations or along large streets.
New development in the Avenues style along the Queen Street East in Leslievill
Above all, Fearon emphasizes that growth must be contextual. Grandpa 778 offers a universal framework that can be applied in all ways, which means that it can be processed easier and faster for developmental treatments in the areas of Avenue growth areas. However, this frame leaves space for flexibility so that every development can react appropriately to its local environment and minimize the effects on the community that already existed there.
Grandpa 778 is only one aspect of the city's housing action plan to tackle the real estate crisis in the city. We will keep you up to date on other important steps from City employees as part of the HAP. In the meantime, however, you can tell us what you think by leaving a comment in the room provided on this page.
* * *
Urbantoronto has a research service, UtPro, which delivers comprehensive data on development projects in the Greater Golden Horseshoe – from the proposal to completion. We also offer immediate reports, downloadable snapshots based on the location, and a daily subscription newsletter, New Development Insider, which pursues projects from the first application.