U.S. election shows that good housing policy isn’t made on the trail

0
87
Financial Post

Breadcrumb trail links

Despite ample evidence that rent controls often fail, such measures continue to crop up in elections.

Published 03 September 20244 minutes reading time

You can save this article by registering for free here. Or log in if you already have an account.

Democratic presidential candidate and U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during a campaign rally at IBEW Local Union #5 on September 2, 2024 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.Democratic presidential candidate and U.S. Vice President Kamala Harris speaks during a campaign rally at IBEW Local Union #5 on September 2, 2024 in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania. Photo by Michael M. Santiago/Getty Images

Article content

By Murtaza Haider and Stephen Moranis

Close election campaigns often lead to questionable economic policies. In the hotly contested US presidential election, Democrats have addressed housing problems in key swing states by promising to create more affordable housing. But some of their proposals, such as rent caps, risk exacerbating the very problem they are trying to solve.

Display 2

This ad hasn't loaded yet, but your article will continue below.

THIS CONTENT IS FOR SUBSCRIBERS ONLY

Subscribe now to read the latest news from your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
  • Daily content from the Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from the Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic copy of the print edition for viewing on any device, sharing and commenting.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

SUBSCRIBE TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Subscribe now to read the latest news from your city and across Canada.

  • Exclusive articles from Barbara Shecter, Joe O'Connor, Gabriel Friedman and others.
  • Daily content from the Financial Times, the world's leading global business publication.
  • Unlimited online access to read articles from the Financial Post, National Post and 15 news sites across Canada with one account.
  • National Post ePaper, an electronic copy of the print edition for viewing on any device, sharing and commenting.
  • Daily puzzles, including the New York Times Crossword.

REGISTER / LOGIN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES

Create an account or log in to continue your reading experience.

  • Access articles from across Canada with one account.
  • Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments.
  • Look forward to additional articles every month.
  • Get email updates from your favorite authors.

Sign in or create an account

or

Article content

As in Canada, housing prices and rents in the US have risen more than incomes. Another notable similarity between the two countries is the severe housing shortage. Some US estimates put the shortage at three million homes. Kamala Harris, the Democratic presidential candidate, has unveiled a series of measures as part of her housing plan, some aimed at accelerating supply and others at containing prices and rents.

Housing policies on both sides of the 49th parallel are remarkably similar. Cash grants and tax credits for first-time homebuyers, tax incentives for developers to build affordable housing, and the provision of surplus federal land for housing projects are just a few examples of the nearly identical incentives being implemented in the United States and Canada to address housing affordability.

Harris' plan also includes a 5 percent cap on rent increases, a concept she adopted from President Joe Biden during his re-election campaign. Although there is a wealth of empirical evidence that rent controls often fail and can even exacerbate affordability problems for those who don't live in rent-controlled housing, such measures often resurface during close elections. The plan targets large landlords who own more than 50 units.

Top Stories

Top Stories

Thanks for signing up

Article content

Display 3

This ad hasn't loaded yet, but your article will continue below.

Article content

Biden's rent cap proposal requires congressional approval, and experts say it's unlikely to pass. But even if it doesn't, the mere introduction of the plan signals the administration's intent and suggests that such measures could eventually be implemented under politically favorable circumstances.

Rent caps have been an issue for Harris since at least 2019. As Vox reported, Harris tweeted her support for Oregon after the state passed a statewide rent control measure. As a senator, she also sponsored legislation promising tax relief for households burdened by excessive housing costs.

Housing affordability is a growing concern for many Americans. According to the Pew Research Center, in 2021, half of Americans said housing was a significant problem, up 10 percentage points from just three years earlier. Young Americans are particularly affected: 70 percent believe younger generations face greater challenges in purchasing a home than their parents. Not surprisingly, housing is becoming a major issue in the presidential election.

Display 4

This ad hasn't loaded yet, but your article will continue below.

Article content

The severity of housing problems requires a thoughtful and effective policy response that provides immediate relief and sustainable long-term solutions. However, in politically charged environments, public policy often falls victim to political expediency, resulting in the implementation of measures that may be more popular than practical. One such measure is rent control.

The evidence against rent control is extensive and well-documented. In August, Konstantin A. Kholodilin, a senior researcher at the German Institute for Economic Research, published what he called “the most comprehensive review of the literature on rent control over the period 1967-2024.”

Kholodilin examined 206 studies on the topic and concluded that while rent control can benefit those already living in rent-regulated housing, it often leads to a number of unintended consequences, including suppressing the supply of new housing, reducing labor mobility, and raising rents in unregulated markets, ultimately exacerbating the housing crisis rather than alleviating it.

Display 5

This ad hasn't loaded yet, but your article will continue below.

Article content

The political climate in Canada is heated as opposition leader Pierre Poilievre pushes the government's coalition partners to defect, potentially setting the stage for a federal election. If a mandate is dropped, populist measures could quickly emerge.

Recently, the Liberal government in Ottawa unveiled a plan to sell or lease 56 federally owned parcels of land to developers to create affordable housing. While increasing the supply of affordable housing is a well-supported strategy, evidence suggests it is only part of the solution. Lowering exorbitant municipal development fees and speeding up slow permitting processes would significantly boost the construction of homes that Canadians can afford.

Canada's housing policy must be based on evidence and sound research. It must also commit to providing safe and affordable housing for those who currently cannot afford housing. This means governments must invest more in non-market, social housing.

Editor's recommendations

  1. The moon hovers over Vancouver's skyline. The west coast city and Toronto resemble global real estate markets like New York and London.

    Report warns: Greater housing supply could mean lower affordability

  2. Financial support from family to buy a home has helped some, but for others it has exacerbated problems, as those with parental support have been able to purchase larger and more expensive homes.

    The dark side of financing through mum and dad’s bank

Display 6

This ad hasn't loaded yet, but your article will continue below.

Article content

However, imposing rent controls on the private market shifts the burden from governments to private companies. History shows that such measures provide limited benefits and tend to cause more problems in the long run. With elections approaching next year, Canadians should be on the lookout for questionable policy proposals.

Murtaza Haider is associate dean of graduate programs and director of the Urban Analytics Institute at the Ted Rogers School of Management at Toronto Metropolitan University. Stephen Moranis is a real estate industry veteran. You can reach them through the Haider-Moranis Bulletin website: www.hmbulletin.com.

Bookmark our website and support our journalism: Don't miss out on the business news you need to know – bookmark financialpost.com and sign up for our newsletters here.

Article content

Share this article on your social network